PNG vs JPG vs WEBP vs BMP
Choosing output format affects quality, transparency support, and file size. For most websites, WEBP or JPG is usually best for photos, while PNG is better for logos, UI assets, and images that require alpha transparency.
Drag & drop an image. Convert locally (no upload). Also supports paste (Ctrl+V).
Notes: JPG removes transparency. Animated images may export the first frame only.
Choosing output format affects quality, transparency support, and file size. For most websites, WEBP or JPG is usually best for photos, while PNG is better for logos, UI assets, and images that require alpha transparency.
Lossless compression, transparency supported, usually larger for photos.
Lossy compression, no transparency, strong size reduction for photo content.
Modern format with good compression efficiency, supports transparency, often web-friendly.
Very simple/legacy format, typically large size, rarely ideal for web delivery.
For the same photo-like image at similar visual quality, file size is often: BMP > PNG > JPG ≈ WEBP. For graphics with flat colors and transparency, PNG can outperform JPG in visual quality and workflow simplicity.
Use PNG when you need transparency, sharp text edges, or lossless output for UI graphics.
Not always, but WEBP is often smaller at similar perceived quality for many web images.
Different formats compress differently. A format switch can increase size depending on image content and quality level.